The Most Overlooked Section of Your Paper That Editors Notice First

2025-09-08 16:21:50
4 min read

Discover the most overlooked sections of a research paper that editors notice first. Learn practical tips to refine them.

The Most Overlooked Section of Your Paper That Editors Notice First

When researchers submit a manuscript, they often focus on results, discussion, and data analysis, assuming these are the sections that determine acceptance. However, editors often notice sections that are overlooked or underappreciated—and mistakes here can delay review, lead to desk rejection, or reduce the chances of acceptance.

This guide explains which sections are commonly overlooked, provides practical tips to refine them, and outlines what editors expect to ensure smooth acceptance.


Overlooked Sections of a Research Paper

Editors often notice these sections first and judge the paper’s quality, professionalism, and readiness:

Analyzing the Sections of a Research Paper

Title Page and Author Information

  • Includes the paper title, author names, affiliations, corresponding author details, running title, keywords, and funding/acknowledgments.

Abstract

  • The first section editors read to determine relevance and clarity.

Keywords

  • Small but critical for indexing and discoverability.

Introduction

  • Often overlooked for clarity, literature coverage, and alignment with journal scope.

Figures and Tables

  • Visuals convey data efficiently, but errors in labeling or formatting catch editors’ attention.

References

  • Correct formatting, completeness, and currency of references are often checked immediately.

Ethical Statements and Declarations

  • Missing conflict of interest, ethical approval, or funding info is noticed early and can delay review.


Step-by-Step Tips to Refine These Sections

1. Title Page and Author Information

Why editors notice it:

  • The title page is your first impression. Errors here signal carelessness.

Tips to refine:

  • Ensure the title is concise, clear, and keyword-rich

  • List all authors in correct order, with affiliations and corresponding author details

  • Include running title, keywords, and funding info if requested

  • Double-check spelling and formatting consistency

Editor’s expectation:

  • Professional, complete title page that meets journal guidelines and gives confidence that the manuscript is prepared carefully.


2. Abstract

Why editors notice it:

  • The abstract determines whether editors even send your paper to peer review.

Tips to refine:

  • Stick to the journal’s word limit

  • Follow the required structured format (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusion) if applicable

  • Make it clear, concise, and self-explanatory

  • Highlight novelty and significance of your research

Editor’s expectation:

  • An abstract that quickly communicates the purpose, methods, results, and impact of the study.


3. Keywords

Why editors notice them:

  • Keywords affect indexing and discoverability. Poor choices reduce your paper’s reach.

Tips to refine:

  • Use 3–6 highly relevant keywords

  • Include terms commonly searched in your field

  • Avoid overly broad or rare terms

Editor’s expectation:

  • Accurate keywords that improve visibility and searchability in databases.


4. Introduction

Why editors notice it:

  • Introductions often lack focus, clarity, or alignment with journal scope.

Tips to refine:

  • Start with context and significance of your research

  • Clearly state research gap and objectives

  • Keep it concise and directly aligned with your study

Editor’s expectation:

  • A focused introduction that demonstrates novelty, relevance, and alignment with the journal’s readership.


5. Figures and Tables

Why editors notice them:

  • Poorly formatted visuals indicate lack of attention to detail.

Tips to refine:

  • Use high-resolution images, correct labeling, and numbering

  • Include clear captions and legends

  • Follow journal specifications for color, size, and placement

  • Ensure tables are easy to read and supplement the text

Editor’s expectation:

  • Clear, professional visuals that make data interpretation straightforward.


6. References

Why editors notice them:

  • Incorrect, incomplete, or outdated references are a red flag.

Tips to refine:

  • Follow the journal’s citation style exactly

  • Verify that all in-text citations match the reference list

  • Include recent and relevant literature

  • Use reference management software to avoid mistakes

Editor’s expectation:

  • References that are complete, accurate, and formatted consistently, showing rigor and credibility.


7. Ethical Statements and Declarations

Why editors notice them:

  • Missing conflict of interest, ethical approval, or funding information is often flagged immediately.

Tips to refine:

  • Include statements on human/animal ethics approval

  • Disclose conflicts of interest

  • Provide funding sources and acknowledgments if required

Editor’s expectation:

  • Full transparency about ethical compliance and funding, which increases trustworthiness.


Additional Practical Tips

  1. Follow Journal Guidelines Exactly

    • Use templates if available.

    • Check font type, size, margins, and spacing.

  2. Proofread Multiple Times

    • Even small grammatical or formatting errors can reduce credibility.

  3. Use Professional Editing Services

    • Native English editing improves clarity, especially for international journals.

  4. Create a Pre-Submission Checklist

    • Include title page, abstract, keywords, introduction, figures, tables, references, and ethical statements.

    • Tick off each item before submission to avoid overlooked mistakes.

  5. Respond Promptly to Editorial Requests

    • Quick responses to formatting queries or corrections help avoid further delays.


Key Takeaways

  • Editors notice title pages, abstracts, keywords, figures, tables, references, and ethical statements first.

  • Overlooking these sections can delay peer review or lead to rejection.

  • Refining these areas with attention to detail, adherence to journal guidelines, and professional editing improves acceptance chances.

  • A well-prepared manuscript reflects professionalism and care, making editors more confident in sending it for peer review.


Get Expert Assistance - SITA Academy

Formatting and refining overlooked sections can be challenging, especially if you are submitting to Scopus, Web of Science, or PubMed-indexed journals.

SITA Academy offers professional support to:

  • Format your title page, abstract, figures, tables, and references

  • Ensure your manuscript adheres exactly to journal guidelines

  • Improve language clarity and compliance

  • Manage submission and communication with editors

Submit your manuscript to SITA Academy today and maximize your chances of smooth acceptance and faster publication.

Verified Contact Channels

If you have any questions, inquiries, or would like to learn more about our services, please don't hesitate to reach out to us. Our dedicated team is ready to assist you.

Rate
1 5
  Share:

Frequently asked questions

1. What sections of a paper do editors notice first?
2. What ethical statements should be included?
3. How can I ensure my manuscript meets journal standards?
Comments
Your comment
optional
optional
required
Chat via