Discover the most overlooked sections of a research paper that editors notice first. Learn practical tips to refine them.
When researchers submit a manuscript, they often focus on results, discussion, and data analysis, assuming these are the sections that determine acceptance. However, editors often notice sections that are overlooked or underappreciated—and mistakes here can delay review, lead to desk rejection, or reduce the chances of acceptance.
This guide explains which sections are commonly overlooked, provides practical tips to refine them, and outlines what editors expect to ensure smooth acceptance.
Editors often notice these sections first and judge the paper’s quality, professionalism, and readiness:
Includes the paper title, author names, affiliations, corresponding author details, running title, keywords, and funding/acknowledgments.
The first section editors read to determine relevance and clarity.
Small but critical for indexing and discoverability.
Often overlooked for clarity, literature coverage, and alignment with journal scope.
Visuals convey data efficiently, but errors in labeling or formatting catch editors’ attention.
Correct formatting, completeness, and currency of references are often checked immediately.
Missing conflict of interest, ethical approval, or funding info is noticed early and can delay review.
Why editors notice it:
The title page is your first impression. Errors here signal carelessness.
Tips to refine:
Ensure the title is concise, clear, and keyword-rich
List all authors in correct order, with affiliations and corresponding author details
Include running title, keywords, and funding info if requested
Double-check spelling and formatting consistency
Editor’s expectation:
Professional, complete title page that meets journal guidelines and gives confidence that the manuscript is prepared carefully.
Why editors notice it:
The abstract determines whether editors even send your paper to peer review.
Tips to refine:
Stick to the journal’s word limit
Follow the required structured format (Background, Methods, Results, Conclusion) if applicable
Make it clear, concise, and self-explanatory
Highlight novelty and significance of your research
Editor’s expectation:
An abstract that quickly communicates the purpose, methods, results, and impact of the study.
Why editors notice them:
Keywords affect indexing and discoverability. Poor choices reduce your paper’s reach.
Tips to refine:
Use 3–6 highly relevant keywords
Include terms commonly searched in your field
Avoid overly broad or rare terms
Editor’s expectation:
Accurate keywords that improve visibility and searchability in databases.
Why editors notice it:
Introductions often lack focus, clarity, or alignment with journal scope.
Tips to refine:
Start with context and significance of your research
Clearly state research gap and objectives
Keep it concise and directly aligned with your study
Editor’s expectation:
A focused introduction that demonstrates novelty, relevance, and alignment with the journal’s readership.
Why editors notice them:
Poorly formatted visuals indicate lack of attention to detail.
Tips to refine:
Use high-resolution images, correct labeling, and numbering
Include clear captions and legends
Follow journal specifications for color, size, and placement
Ensure tables are easy to read and supplement the text
Editor’s expectation:
Clear, professional visuals that make data interpretation straightforward.
Why editors notice them:
Incorrect, incomplete, or outdated references are a red flag.
Tips to refine:
Follow the journal’s citation style exactly
Verify that all in-text citations match the reference list
Include recent and relevant literature
Use reference management software to avoid mistakes
Editor’s expectation:
References that are complete, accurate, and formatted consistently, showing rigor and credibility.
Why editors notice them:
Missing conflict of interest, ethical approval, or funding information is often flagged immediately.
Tips to refine:
Include statements on human/animal ethics approval
Disclose conflicts of interest
Provide funding sources and acknowledgments if required
Editor’s expectation:
Full transparency about ethical compliance and funding, which increases trustworthiness.
Follow Journal Guidelines Exactly
Use templates if available.
Check font type, size, margins, and spacing.
Proofread Multiple Times
Even small grammatical or formatting errors can reduce credibility.
Use Professional Editing Services
Native English editing improves clarity, especially for international journals.
Create a Pre-Submission Checklist
Include title page, abstract, keywords, introduction, figures, tables, references, and ethical statements.
Tick off each item before submission to avoid overlooked mistakes.
Respond Promptly to Editorial Requests
Quick responses to formatting queries or corrections help avoid further delays.
Editors notice title pages, abstracts, keywords, figures, tables, references, and ethical statements first.
Overlooking these sections can delay peer review or lead to rejection.
Refining these areas with attention to detail, adherence to journal guidelines, and professional editing improves acceptance chances.
A well-prepared manuscript reflects professionalism and care, making editors more confident in sending it for peer review.
Formatting and refining overlooked sections can be challenging, especially if you are submitting to Scopus, Web of Science, or PubMed-indexed journals.
SITA Academy offers professional support to:
Format your title page, abstract, figures, tables, and references
Ensure your manuscript adheres exactly to journal guidelines
Improve language clarity and compliance
Manage submission and communication with editors
Submit your manuscript to SITA Academy today and maximize your chances of smooth acceptance and faster publication.
If you have any questions, inquiries, or would like to learn more about our services, please don't hesitate to reach out to us. Our dedicated team is ready to assist you.